Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether delay in furnishing Form No. 67 under Rule 128(9) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 disentitles the assessee from foreign tax credit, and whether such non-furnishing could justify denial of the claim in rectification proceedings.
Analysis: The assessee was otherwise entitled to foreign tax credit under Section 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 24 of the India-Australia tax treaty. Rule 128 was examined as the procedural mechanism for claiming the credit, including the requirement to furnish Form No. 67 by the due date. The Tribunal held that the rule does not expressly provide for disallowance of foreign tax credit on account of delayed filing of the form. It treated the filing requirement as directory and procedural, not mandatory in the sense of extinguishing the substantive right to credit. The Tribunal also held that the treaty entitlement, being more beneficial, could not be overridden by a restrictive reading of the rule, and that the issue was not debatable so as to bar rectification relief under Section 154.
Conclusion: Delay in filing Form No. 67 did not justify denial of foreign tax credit, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.
Final Conclusion: The assessment action disallowing foreign tax credit was set aside and the assessee's claim was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: A procedural rule governing the manner and time for furnishing Form No. 67 cannot be construed to defeat the substantive treaty-based right to foreign tax credit in the absence of an express statutory consequence of disallowance.