Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether delay in filing Form 67 could justify denial of foreign tax credit claimed by the assessee.
Analysis: The credit claimed related to taxes paid outside India and was duly reflected in the return. Rule 128 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 was examined and sub-rule (9) was held not to prescribe denial of foreign tax credit for delayed filing of Form 67. The requirement of filing Form 67 was treated as directory, not mandatory, and no adverse consequence for non-compliance was found in the rule. The provisions of section 90 and section 91 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were noted to contain no timeline for furnishing such declaration, and the treaty position under the DTAA was also relied upon.
Conclusion: Delay in filing Form 67 did not justify denial of the foreign tax credit. The credit was directed to be allowed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to relief for foreign tax credit, and the matter was sent back only for verification and allowance of the claim.
Ratio Decidendi: Furnishing Form 67 for foreign tax credit is a directory procedural requirement, and delay in filing it cannot by itself defeat a substantive claim for credit where the tax paid abroad and the underlying claim are otherwise duly disclosed.