Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Foreign Tax Credit could be denied for delay in filing Form No. 67 under Rule 128(9) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, and whether the relevant DTAA entitled the assessee to credit of tax paid in Malaysia notwithstanding such procedural default.
Analysis: The claim for Foreign Tax Credit was supported by tax deducted in Malaysia on the same salary income that was offered to tax in India. The Tribunal noted that the DTAA entitlement to relief was not disputed on merits and that Rule 128(9) did not provide for disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit merely because Form No. 67 was filed belatedly. It further relied on the settled principle that a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement prevails over the Act and the Rules to the extent it is more beneficial to the assessee. The contrary view taken by the lower authority was held to be unsustainable, and the earlier reasoning treating the filing requirement as mandatory was not accepted.
Conclusion: Foreign Tax Credit could not be denied solely on account of delayed filing of Form No. 67, and the issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification of the supporting documents and reconsideration in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where treaty-based Foreign Tax Credit is otherwise allowable, delay in filing Form No. 67 under Rule 128(9) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 is a directory procedural lapse and cannot, by itself, defeat the substantive DTAA relief.