TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Dismisses Revenue's Appeal; Form No. 67 Filing Ruled Directory for Foreign Tax Credit Claim</h1> <h3>ITO, Non-Corporate Ward-19 (4), Chennai Versus Smt. Chengam Durga</h3> The Appellate Tribunal in Chennai dismissed the Revenue's appeal for the Assessment Year 2021-22 concerning the grant of foreign tax credit. The Tribunal ... Denial of foreign tax credit (FTC) - Form No. 67 was not filed by the assessee within due date of filing of return of income - HELD THAT:- We find that this issue is squarely covered by the cited decision of Bangalore Tribunal. Recently, in the case of Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy[2023 (11) TMI 1000 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] held that filing of aforesaid form in terms of Rule 128 is only directory in nature. The rule is only for the implementation of the provisions of the act and it will always be directory in nature The Appellate Tribunal in Chennai heard an appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2021-22 regarding the grant of foreign tax credit. The Revenue challenged the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) related to the filing of Form No. 67. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner based on a similar case in Bangalore and a recent ruling by the Madras High Court, stating that the filing of Form No. 67 is directory in nature. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
