Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Grants Relief for Foreign Tax Credit, Overrides Procedural Delay in Filing, Upholds Taxpayer's Substantive Rights.</h1> <h3>Shri Ritesh Kumar Garg Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (2), Jaipur</h3> Shri Ritesh Kumar Garg Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (2), Jaipur - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) under section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Procedural compliance regarding the filing of Form 67 within the stipulated time.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) under section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The main issue in this appeal is the disallowance of FTC amounting to Rs. 1,67,300/- under section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a salaried individual employed with M/s. Infosys Limited, was posted in Finland and paid taxes there. The assessee filed Form 67 online on 01.01.2020 to claim relief under section 90, but the claim was denied by the Assessing Officer (AO) and subsequently upheld by the CIT (A) on the grounds that Form 67 was not filed within the due date stipulated under Rule 128(9).2. Procedural compliance regarding the filing of Form 67 within the stipulated time:The CIT (A) confirmed the disallowance based on the failure to submit Form 67 within the prescribed time limit. The CIT (A) stated: 'Since the appellant has failed to submit Form 67 within the stipulated time limit, the AO while passing the intimation order disallowed the claim of Foreign Tax Credit u/s. 90 of the Act.'The assessee argued that the disallowance of FTC is bad in law, emphasizing that neither section 90 nor the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with Finland mandates disallowance for non-compliance with procedural requirements. The assessee cited that FTC is a vested right under Article 22(2) of the DTAA read with section 90, which cannot be disallowed for procedural lapses.Key Arguments and Legal Precedents:- The assessee contended that Rule 128 is procedural and not mandatory. The rule requires Form 67 to be filed on or before the due date of filing the return of income under section 139(1). However, the rule does not explicitly state that FTC would be denied if Form 67 is filed late.- The assessee relied on the Supreme Court decisions in Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner and Sambhaji & Ors. v. Gangabai & Ors., which held that procedural requirements should not override substantive rights.- The Bangalore Tribunal in Brinda Rama Krishna vs. ITO and 42 Hertz Software India (P) Ltd vs. ACIT allowed FTC relief even when Form 67 was filed late, emphasizing that procedural requirements should not negate substantive rights.Tribunal's Findings:The Tribunal noted that the assessee is entitled to claim relief under section 90, but the disallowance was confirmed solely due to the late filing of Form 67. The Tribunal highlighted that neither section 90 nor the DTAA specifies that FTC should be disallowed for procedural non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized that procedural rules should aid in justice and not act as a barrier.The Tribunal also observed that Form 67 was available with the AO at the time of passing the intimation order under section 143(1). The Tribunal disagreed with the Visakhapatnam Bench's decision in Muralikrishna Vaddi vs. ACIT/DCIT, instead aligning with the Bangalore Tribunal's decisions in Brinda Rama Krishna and 42 Hertz Software India Pvt. Ltd.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to FTC relief under section 90 of the Act. The AO was directed to allow the relief of Rs. 1,67,300/- towards FTC. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 15/09/2022.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found