Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Foreign tax credit cannot be denied solely for delayed filing of Form 67 under rule 128</h1> <h3>Sukdev Sen Versus ACIT, Circle-61, Kolkata.</h3> Sukdev Sen Versus ACIT, Circle-61, Kolkata. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Legality of the disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) due to delayed filing of Form No. 67.2. Nature of the requirement to file Form No. 67-whether procedural/directory or mandatory.3. Applicability of Section 90 of the Income Tax Act and Article 25 of the DTAA between India and the USA.4. Charging of excess interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C.Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit Due to Delayed Filing of Form No. 67:The primary issue in this case was whether the assessee's claim for Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) could be denied due to the delayed filing of Form No. 67. The Assessing Officer disallowed the FTC claim of Rs. 21,89,828/- because Form No. 67 was filed after the due date for filing the return of income. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, leading to the present appeal. The Tribunal noted that Rule 128 of the Income Tax Rules requires Form No. 67 to be filed before the due date for filing the return of income. However, the rule does not explicitly state that FTC will be disallowed if the form is filed late. The Tribunal concluded that the requirement to file Form No. 67 is procedural and directory, not mandatory, and therefore, the FTC should not be denied solely due to the delay.2. Nature of the Requirement to File Form No. 67:The Tribunal examined whether the requirement to file Form No. 67 is procedural/directory or mandatory. It was argued that the procedural requirement should not extinguish the substantive right to claim FTC. The Tribunal referred to several precedents, including decisions by other Tribunals and the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which have held that procedural requirements should not override substantive rights unless explicitly stated. The Tribunal concurred with these views, stating that the filing of Form No. 67 is a procedural requirement and non-compliance should not result in the denial of FTC.3. Applicability of Section 90 of the Income Tax Act and Article 25 of the DTAA:The Tribunal highlighted that Section 90 of the Income Tax Act, along with Article 25(2)(a) of the DTAA between India and the USA, provides for the allowance of tax paid in the USA as a credit against tax payable in India. Neither the Act nor the DTAA specifies that FTC should be disallowed for procedural non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized that DTAA provisions override the Income Tax Act unless the latter is more beneficial to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the assessee's right to FTC could not be denied due to procedural delays in filing Form No. 67.4. Charging of Excess Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C:The assessee also contested the charging of excess interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The Tribunal noted that these grounds are consequential in nature and do not require separate adjudication. However, it directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the interest after granting the FTC, ensuring that the interest charged aligns with the revised tax liability.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the benefit of FTC in accordance with the law and the DTAA between India and the USA. It emphasized that procedural delays in filing Form No. 67 should not preclude the assessee from claiming FTC. The decision underscores the principle that procedural requirements should not override substantive rights unless explicitly mandated by law.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found