Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was required to process the remaining applications in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing and to consider Clause 9.3 of Chapter 9 of the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures.
Analysis: The order recorded a prima facie non-compliance with the earlier direction requiring all applications to be processed and decided within the stipulated time. The respondent's communication could not displace the obligation to decide the remaining applications independently and in accordance with law. The Court also directed that Clause 9.3 of Chapter 9 of the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures be considered while passing the fresh decision, and that the decision be taken after giving an opportunity of hearing to the authorised officer of the applicant, unless excluded by law.
Conclusion: The respondent was directed to process the remaining applications afresh and decide them in accordance with law after hearing the applicant, while considering Clause 9.3 of Chapter 9 of the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures.