https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418497 The respondent had to process the remaining applications afresh in accordance with law after giving the applicant an opportunity of hearing, because the earlier communication did not displace the obligation to decide the applications independently within the stipulated time. The fresh decision was also required to take into account Clause 9.3 of Chapter 9 of the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures. The direction emphasised compliance with the earlier mandate, independent consideration of the pending applications, and hearing of the authorised officer unless excluded by law. en-us Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418497 The respondent had to process the remaining applications afresh in accordance with law after giving the applicant an opportunity of hearing, because the earlier communication did not displace the obligation to decide the applications independently within the stipulated time. The fresh decision was also required to take into account Clause 9.3 of Chapter 9 of the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures. The direction emphasised compliance with the earlier mandate, independent consideration of the pending applications, and hearing of the authorised officer unless excluded by law. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418497