Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (1) TMI 673 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeals, directs deletion of addition for client code modification. Validity of assessment order dismissed. The tribunal partly allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. The tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made on account of client code ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal allows appeals, directs deletion of addition for client code modification. Validity of assessment order dismissed.

                            The tribunal partly allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. The tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made on account of client code modification, setting aside the CIT(A)'s findings. The issue of the validity of the assessment order framed under section 147 was dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced on 08/11/2021 in Ahmedabad.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of reopening the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Confirmation of the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of client code modification.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of Reopening the Assessment under Section 147:

                            The first issue raised by the assessee was the validity of the assessment order framed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee contended that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] had erred in confirming the action of the AO in reopening the assessment. The assessee argued that the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshaft (India) Ltd. was not followed in its letter and spirit, thereby rendering the consequential reassessment order liable to be quashed.

                            However, the tribunal noted that the issue raised by the assessee on merit had been decided in her favor regarding the addition made by the AO. Given this, the tribunal refrained from deciding the issue on the validity of the assessment order framed under section 147, as it became infructuous. Therefore, the technical issue raised by the assessee was dismissed as infructuous.

                            2. Confirmation of Addition Made by the AO on Account of Client Code Modification:

                            The second issue was regarding the confirmation of the addition of Rs. 29,66,471 made by the AO on account of client code modification done by the broker to shift the profit. The assessee argued that the AO made the addition arbitrarily and did not provide specific transaction-wise breakup of the modification. The assessee also contended that the client code modifications were mistakes committed by the broker's staff, and no adverse inference should be drawn against the assessee.

                            The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's order, observing that the appellant had indulged in client code modification (CCM) to shift in losses and set off against taxable income. The CIT(A) noted that the AO had concrete information and scientific analysis showing that CCMs were not carried out to rectify genuine errors but to completely replace one client code with another. The CIT(A) also highlighted that the appellant failed to refute the allegations and did not provide any evidence to show that the appellant had not benefited from these transactions.

                            Upon appeal, the tribunal examined the facts and noted that the client codes were modified as per the information received from the investigation wing. The tribunal emphasized that client code modifications give rise to suspicion, requiring detailed investigations to reveal the truth. The tribunal found that no such detailed investigation was carried out by the authorities. Moreover, the tribunal observed that in most cases, the client code modification was carried out with the assessee's relatives, making it unlikely that the assessee would manipulate the income/loss with them.

                            The tribunal concluded that the authorities below did not carry out the necessary verification/examination and thus set aside the findings of the CIT(A). The tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made by him, allowing the ground of appeal of the assessee.

                            Conclusion:

                            In the combined result, both appeals filed by the different assessee were partly allowed. The tribunal set aside the findings of the CIT(A) regarding the addition made on account of client code modification and directed the AO to delete the addition. The issue of the validity of the assessment order framed under section 147 was dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced in the court on 08/11/2021 at Ahmedabad.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found