Tribunal Grants Insolvency Process Against Personal Guarantor, Imposes Moratorium The Tribunal granted the application to initiate the Insolvency Resolution Process against a Personal Guarantor who had guaranteed loans for a defaulting ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal Grants Insolvency Process Against Personal Guarantor, Imposes Moratorium
The Tribunal granted the application to initiate the Insolvency Resolution Process against a Personal Guarantor who had guaranteed loans for a defaulting Corporate Debtor. An Interim Moratorium period was imposed under Section 96(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, halting legal actions. Smt. Reshma Mittal was appointed as the Resolution Professional to oversee the process, ensuring asset protection and effective resolution. The Resolution Professional was directed to serve relevant parties, provide financial information, and make recommendations within the specified timeframe. The case was scheduled for further proceedings to follow the procedural steps in the insolvency process against the Personal Guarantor.
Issues: Initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process against a Personal Guarantor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The State Bank of India filed an application seeking to initiate the Insolvency Resolution Process against a Personal Guarantor who had guaranteed loans availed by a Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor had defaulted on its credit facility, leading to the need for resolution. The application was filed under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, along with Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Rules, 2019. The total debt from the Personal Guarantor was stated to be approximately Rs. 34,78,76,322. A Demand Notice was sent to the Personal Guarantor, and the application highlighted the default in payment by the Personal Guarantor within the statutory period.
The Tribunal acknowledged the initiation of the Interim Moratorium period as per Section 96(1) of the Code, which stays any legal actions or proceedings related to the debts of the Personal Guarantor. The appointment of a Resolution Professional, in this case, Smt. Reshma Mittal, was confirmed to safeguard the assets of the Personal Guarantor and manage the resolution process effectively. The Resolution Professional was directed to serve relevant parties with copies of the order and application, ensuring cooperation from the Personal Guarantor and the provision of necessary financial information.
Furthermore, the Resolution Professional was instructed to exercise powers under Section 99 of the Code and make recommendations on the application within the stipulated time frame. The Resolution Professional was required to provide a copy of the report to the Creditor once filed before the Authority. The matter was listed for further proceedings on a specified date, emphasizing the procedural steps to be followed in the Insolvency Resolution Process against the Personal Guarantor.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
