Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether quotations recovered during inspection, without proof of movement of goods and delivery outside the State, could be treated as sales suppression and inter-State sales exigible to tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: For an inter-State sale under Section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, there must be a sale of goods, movement of those goods from one State to another, and an integral link between the sale and such movement. The material on record did not establish actual movement of goods or delivery to a carrier for onward transport. Mere recovery of quotations from the business premises, without supporting evidence that the quotations fructified into sales, was insufficient to treat the amounts as taxable turnover. The first appellate authority had therefore correctly deleted the turnover and set aside the assessments.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's contrary view was unsustainable. The writ petitions were allowed, the Tribunal's orders were set aside, and the orders of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner restoring deletion of the disputed turnover were upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Quotation documents alone cannot establish an inter-State sale unless the revenue proves actual sale, movement of goods across State boundaries, and the requisite nexus between the sale and such movement.