Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim for advance deposit was barred by limitation, and whether the period of limitation was to be governed by the Limitation Act rather than Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The revision authority held that, for refund of advance deposit, the applicable limitation was under the Limitation Act and not under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules. It also held that limitation had to be counted from the later of the date on which the petitioners ceased to operate under the Compounded Levy Scheme or the date on which they were finally absolved of liabilities under that scheme.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not barred by limitation.