<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (6) TMI 38 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41197</link>
    <description>For refund of an advance deposit, the applicable limitation was held to arise under the Limitation Act and not under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules. Limitation was to be counted from the later of the date the assessees ceased to operate under the Compounded Levy Scheme or the date they were finally absolved of liabilities under that scheme, and on that basis the refund claim was not barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 11:58:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (6) TMI 38 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41197</link>
      <description>For refund of an advance deposit, the applicable limitation was held to arise under the Limitation Act and not under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules. Limitation was to be counted from the later of the date the assessees ceased to operate under the Compounded Levy Scheme or the date they were finally absolved of liabilities under that scheme, and on that basis the refund claim was not barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>