Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the name of the struck off company and the consequential disqualifications of its directors should be restored in exercise of the Tribunal's power under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Analysis: The company had been struck off for non-filing of statutory returns and financial statements, attracting the statutory scheme under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petition was filed within the period permitted by Section 252(3), the Registrar did not oppose restoration, and there was no material showing any inquiry, investigation, or complaint pending against the company. The Tribunal also noted that the company was stated to be a going concern, that restoration would protect stakeholder interests, and that the default in compliance was not shown to be deliberate. In these circumstances, a lenient approach was taken in the interest of justice and ease of doing business.
Conclusion: The prayer for restoration was allowed and the company's name was directed to be restored, along with consequential restoration of the directors' DINs, subject to compliance with the stated filing and cost conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: A struck off company may be restored under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 where the petition is maintainable, there is no opposing public interest objection, and restoration would better serve the interests of justice and the business stakeholders.