<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 513 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402921</link>
    <description>A struck off company may be restored under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 where the petition is timely, the Registrar does not object, and no pending inquiry, investigation, or complaint shows a public interest bar to restoration. The Tribunal treated the company&#039;s status as a going concern, the absence of deliberate non-compliance, and the protection of stakeholder interests as supporting a lenient approach in the interest of justice and ease of doing business. The company&#039;s name was restored, and the consequential disqualification-related DIN consequences for its directors were also directed to be restored, subject to the stated filing and cost conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 513 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402921</link>
      <description>A struck off company may be restored under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 where the petition is timely, the Registrar does not object, and no pending inquiry, investigation, or complaint shows a public interest bar to restoration. The Tribunal treated the company&#039;s status as a going concern, the absence of deliberate non-compliance, and the protection of stakeholder interests as supporting a lenient approach in the interest of justice and ease of doing business. The company&#039;s name was restored, and the consequential disqualification-related DIN consequences for its directors were also directed to be restored, subject to the stated filing and cost conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>