Delhi HC Rules on Payment Dispute: Petitioner Must Settle Balance, Possible Auction of Containers The Delhi High Court, with Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, ruled in a payment dispute case between a petitioner and ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delhi HC Rules on Payment Dispute: Petitioner Must Settle Balance, Possible Auction of Containers
The Delhi High Court, with Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, ruled in a payment dispute case between a petitioner and respondent no.2, Container Corporation of India Limited. The petitioner paid Rs. 100,22,920/- towards the outstanding amount and undertook to settle the remaining balance of Rs. 1,16,15,920/- along with any extra demurrage within four weeks. The court granted permission for the petitioner to seek a waiver of charges and outlined the consequences of breaching the undertaking. If the petitioner fails to comply, respondent no.2 can auction the containers. The court disposed of the writ petition with pending applications, subject to certain conditions and related orders.
Issues: 1. Payment of outstanding amount by the petitioner to respondent no.2. 2. Undertaking by the petitioner to pay the balance amount and any additional demurrage. 3. Liberty granted to file an application for waiver of charges. 4. Consequences of breaching the undertaking. 5. Disposal of the writ petition with pending application.
Analysis: The judgment delivered by the Delhi High Court, with Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, primarily revolves around the payment dispute between the petitioner and respondent no.2, Container Corporation of India Limited. The petitioner had paid Rs. 100,22,920/- on 30th September, 2020, towards the outstanding amount as per the court's order dated 28th September, 2020. Respondent no.2 confirmed the receipt of this payment and stated that the remaining balance due from the petitioner is Rs. 1,16,15,920/-. Additionally, nine examination job orders were issued to the petitioner on the same day. The petitioner's senior counsel assured the court that the balance amount, along with any extra demurrage, would be settled within four weeks. The petitioner sought permission to request a waiver of charges from respondent no.2, which was accepted by the court. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an application for waiver, subject to the decision of Container Corporation of India Limited in accordance with the law.
Furthermore, the judgment outlined the consequences of breaching the undertaking provided by the petitioner. In case of non-compliance, respondent no.2, Container Corporation of India Limited, was given the liberty to auction the nine containers of the petitioner immediately. The court disposed of the present writ petition along with any pending application, subject to the conditions mentioned in the judgment. It was emphasized that the order passed in this writ petition is subject to the order issued in W.P.(C) No.13099/2018. Finally, the court directed the immediate uploading of the order on the website and the forwarding of a copy to the respective counsel via email.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.