<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399576</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court, with Hon&#039;ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon&#039;ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, ruled in a payment dispute case between a petitioner and respondent no.2, Container Corporation of India Limited. The petitioner paid Rs. 100,22,920/- towards the outstanding amount and undertook to settle the remaining balance of Rs. 1,16,15,920/- along with any extra demurrage within four weeks. The court granted permission for the petitioner to seek a waiver of charges and outlined the consequences of breaching the undertaking. If the petitioner fails to comply, respondent no.2 can auction the containers. The court disposed of the writ petition with pending applications, subject to certain conditions and related orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399576</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court, with Hon&#039;ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon&#039;ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, ruled in a payment dispute case between a petitioner and respondent no.2, Container Corporation of India Limited. The petitioner paid Rs. 100,22,920/- towards the outstanding amount and undertook to settle the remaining balance of Rs. 1,16,15,920/- along with any extra demurrage within four weeks. The court granted permission for the petitioner to seek a waiver of charges and outlined the consequences of breaching the undertaking. If the petitioner fails to comply, respondent no.2 can auction the containers. The court disposed of the writ petition with pending applications, subject to certain conditions and related orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>