Tribunal partially allows appeal, excludes companies from analysis, remands issue, seeks clarification. Working capital and risk adjustments dismissed.

The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Persistent Systems Ltd and Cybercom Datamatics Information Solutions Ltd from the comparability analysis, remanded the issue of Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd to the Dispute Resolution Panel, and sought clarification on the margin figures for Sasken Communication Technology Ltd. Claims for working capital and risk adjustments were dismissed due to lack of substantiation. Interest and penalty charges were also dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
2. Selection of Comparables
3. Working Capital and Risk Adjustment
4. Interest and Penalty Charges

Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The primary issue in this appeal was the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of the arm's length price of the international transaction amounting to Rs. 32,614,009. The AO assessed the total income of the assessee at Rs. 1,416,117,999 against the returned income of Rs. 113,503,990 after making the transfer pricing adjustment for software development services rendered to its parent company.

2. Selection of Comparables:
The assessee contested the inclusion of certain companies as comparables by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).

- Persistent Systems Ltd: The assessee argued for its exclusion, citing functional dissimilarity and lack of segmental information. The Tribunal, after considering the facts and previous orders, directed the TPO/AO to exclude Persistent Systems Ltd from the comparable analysis, noting that the revenue was derived solely from software services without product sales for the current year.

- Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd: The assessee's objections were not considered by the DRP. The Tribunal remanded this issue back to the DRP for reconsideration.

- Sasken Communication Technology Ltd: The assessee pointed out discrepancies in the margin figures used by the TPO. The Tribunal directed the TPO to clarify the basis for the change in margins from 7.28% to 33.2%.

- Cybercom Datamatics Information Solutions Ltd: The assessee argued that this company was not included in the TPO’s show cause notice but was added in the final order. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of this company from the comparability analysis due to the lack of opportunity for the assessee to contest its inclusion.

3. Working Capital and Risk Adjustment:
The assessee sought adjustments for working capital and risk differences. However, no specific arguments or workings were provided to substantiate these claims. The Tribunal noted that these claims were not raised before the lower authorities or supported with necessary documentation. Consequently, this ground was dismissed.

4. Interest and Penalty Charges:
Grounds related to the chargeability of interest under Sections 234B and 234C and the initiation of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) were dismissed as they lacked merit and no specific arguments were presented.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Persistent Systems Ltd and Cybercom Datamatics Information Solutions Ltd from the comparability analysis, remanded the issue of Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd to the DRP, and sought clarification on the margin figures for Sasken Communication Technology Ltd. Claims for working capital and risk adjustments were dismissed due to lack of substantiation. Interest and penalty charges were also dismissed.

---