CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Wrong Cenvat Credit Use

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld a duty demand of Rs.4,39,187/- on the appellants for wrongly availing Cenvat credit in contravention of Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that duty liability arises upon goods' removal from the factory, necessitating the reversal of credit despite the appellants' argument. The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was upheld on 3-12-2007.

---

---

Issues: Duty demand based on wrongful availment of Cenvat credit, contravention of Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, involved a duty demand of Rs.4,39,187/- confirmed on the appellants for wrongly availing Cenvat credit in violation of Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellants had cleared inputs without reversing the credit, leading to the demand. The Tribunal noted the appellants' argument that since they paid duty on a higher value at the time of clearance of IC diesel engines without fitments and later cleared the fitments separately, no reversal of credit was necessary. However, the Tribunal held that under Central Excise law, duty liability arises upon goods' removal from the factory, making the clearance of fitments a clearance of inputs as such, necessitating the reversal of Cenvat credit. The Tribunal cited a previous order in TELCO Ltd. v. CCE, Pune, where it was established that duty paid in excess cannot be set off against subsequent clearances. Despite no appeal by the Revenue against dropping the duty demand, the Tribunal upheld the requirement to reverse the credit, following the precedent set by the earlier order. Therefore, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was rejected. The judgment was pronounced on 3-12-2007.

---