<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 86 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3988</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld a duty demand of Rs.4,39,187/- on the appellants for wrongly availing Cenvat credit in contravention of Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that duty liability arises upon goods&#039; removal from the factory, necessitating the reversal of credit despite the appellants&#039; argument. The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was upheld on 3-12-2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 86 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3988</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld a duty demand of Rs.4,39,187/- on the appellants for wrongly availing Cenvat credit in contravention of Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that duty liability arises upon goods&#039; removal from the factory, necessitating the reversal of credit despite the appellants&#039; argument. The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was upheld on 3-12-2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>