Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1973 (11) TMI 35 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Religious trusts exempt under Income-tax Act for Dawat purposes The trusts were found to be wholly religious and entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal's ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Religious trusts exempt under Income-tax Act for Dawat purposes

                          The trusts were found to be wholly religious and entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the trusts were established for Dawat purposes benefiting the Dawoodi Bohra community. Despite the broad discretion granted to the trustees, the main intent was deemed charitable and religious, aligning with the precedent that Dawat purposes are charitable. Consequently, the trusts were deemed eligible for exemption under section 11(1)(a), and the Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the trusts are wholly religious and entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Interpretation of the trust deed clauses and their implications on the exemption eligibility.
                          3. The nature of the discretion granted to the Dai-ul-Mutlak regarding the utilization of the trust income and corpus.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Whether the trusts are wholly religious and entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                          The main controversy is whether the trusts are entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal observed that the trusts were wholly religious, noting that the properties vested in the Mullaji Saheb for the benefit of the Dawoodi Bohra community. The Tribunal concluded that the trust was wholly religious, thus entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a).

                          2. Interpretation of the trust deed clauses and their implications on the exemption eligibility:
                          The trust deeds, executed on January 12, 1937, by two sisters, vested properties for the benefit of the Dawoodi Bohra community, managed by the Mullaji Saheb. The preamble of the trust deed emphasized the religious belief that the Mullaji Saheb is the vicegerent of the Imam in seclusion. The key clauses analyzed include:

                          - Clause 1: Grants absolute power to the Mullaji Saheb to manage and utilize the properties.
                          - Clause 4: Allows the sale or mortgage of properties if deemed necessary by the Dai-ul-Mutlak, even if the purpose is not strictly religious or charitable.
                          - Clause 6: Requests the net income to be used for specific religious purposes, like Faize-Hashami, or as deemed fit by the Mullaji Saheb.
                          - Clause 7: Similar to Clause 6, with specific purposes like Saifi-Daras and Madresah Tyebiyah, but allows the Mullaji Saheb to use the income for other purposes at his discretion.
                          - Clause 8: Confers absolute discretion on the Dai-ul-Mutlak to use the rents and income for any Dawat purpose, whether charitable or non-charitable.

                          Despite the wide discretion given to the Mullaji Saheb, the court emphasized that the main intent was to create a wakf for Dawat purposes, benefiting the Dawoodi Bohra community.

                          3. The nature of the discretion granted to the Dai-ul-Mutlak regarding the utilization of the trust income and corpus:
                          The court noted that the discretion granted to the Mullaji Saheb must be exercised within the confines of Dawat purposes, which are inherently for the benefit of the Dawoodi Bohra community. The court referred to the decision in Advocate-General of Bombay v. Yasufalli, where it was held that Dawat purposes are charitable. The court concluded that the properties were settled upon trust for charitable or religious objects, thus entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a).

                          Conclusion:
                          The court concluded that the trusts are entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, and the question was answered in favor of the assessee. The Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found