Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the trust was entitled to registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 despite the presence of charitable and religious objects in its deed and the attempted deletion of the objectionable expression by trustees' resolution; (ii) Whether approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was admissible in the facts of the case.
Issue (i): Whether the trust was entitled to registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 despite the presence of charitable and religious objects in its deed and the attempted deletion of the objectionable expression by trustees' resolution.
Analysis: The amendment to the object clause was held to be beyond the competence of the board of trustees and ineffective in law, so the original object clause continued to govern. On merits, the presence of both charitable and religious objects was held not to bar registration, since the statutory bar was confined to a trust or institution created for the benefit of a particular religious community or caste under section 13(1)(b). The trust was found to be covered by the line of authority recognising coexistence of charitable and religious objects. Delay in challenging the earlier rejection was also condoned.
Conclusion: The trust was entitled to registration under section 12AA, and the refusal of registration was set aside.
Issue (ii): Whether approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was admissible in the facts of the case.
Analysis: The trust was found to be hit by section 80G(5)(ii) read with Explanation 3, because one of its objects remained wholly religious in character and there was nothing in the deed limiting religious expenditure to the extent contemplated by section 80G(5B). The statutory conditions for approval were therefore not satisfied.
Conclusion: The denial of approval under section 80G(5)(vi) was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the question of registration under section 12AA but failed on the question of approval under section 80G, resulting in partial relief only.
Ratio Decidendi: A trust may qualify for registration where charitable and religious objects coexist unless it is created for the benefit of a particular religious community or caste, but approval under section 80G can still be refused if the trust deed contains a wholly religious object not confined by the statutory limitations.