Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was maintainable and deserved admission on proof of financial debt, default, limitation and procedural completeness.
Analysis: The application was supported by loan sanction documents, hypothecation deeds, mortgage documents, guarantees, statement of account and a bankers' certificate. The account had been classified as non-performing asset and the record showed default from 30/09/2015. The Tribunal found that the debt exceeded the statutory threshold, the petition had been filed within limitation on the basis of the last payment dated 26/02/2016, and service on the corporate debtor had been effected. The pendency of SARFAESI and DRT proceedings was not treated as a bar to initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process. The application was also found complete in the prescribed form and the proposed insolvency professional was accepted as interim resolution professional.
Conclusion: The petition under section 7 was admitted and corporate insolvency resolution process was directed to commence against the corporate debtor.