Tribunal grants appeal due to denied cross-examination rights, emphasizing fair defense and procedural compliance.

The Tribunal granted an 'out-of-turn' hearing for the appellant's appeal against license revocation and penalties, considering its impact on employees' livelihood. It found the denial of the licensee's right to cross-examine crucial individuals in breach of regulation 17 and emphasized the necessity of cross-examination for a fair defense. The Tribunal criticized the enquiry report's dismissal of the cross-examination request, noting discrepancies and a breach of responsibility by the disciplinary authority. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh enquiry proceedings to rectify procedural irregularities and ensure compliance with regulations.

---

---

Issues:
- Urgent hearing request for appeal
- Denial of procedural right of licensee in enquiry proceedings
- Non-compliance with regulation 17 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation, 2018
- Discrepancies in enquiry report regarding cross-examination request
- Breach of responsibility by disciplinary authority
- Remand of the matter for fresh enquiry proceedings

Urgent Hearing Request for Appeal:
The appellant sought an 'out-of-turn' hearing for their appeal against the revocation of a license and imposition of penalties. The Tribunal found the matter to be urgent due to its impact on the livelihood of individuals employed by the appellant and allowed the early hearing application.

Denial of Procedural Right of Licensee in Enquiry Proceedings:
The appellant's counsel argued that the licensee was denied the right to cross-examine individuals crucial to the proceedings. Despite the mandate of regulation 17(4) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation, 2018, the request for cross-examination was not allowed, leading to a failure to discharge the obligation under the regulation. The Tribunal noted the importance of cross-examination for the appellant's defense and highlighted the authority's failure to explain the non-compliance with valid reasons.

Non-Compliance with Regulation 17 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation, 2018:
The Tribunal observed that the manner in which the enquiry report dismissed the cross-examination request was not in line with regulation 17. It was deemed incorrect to conclude that the statements forming the basis of the show-cause notice did not warrant cross-examination, especially considering the nature of the defense presented by the appellant.

Discrepancies in Enquiry Report Regarding Cross-Examination Request:
The Tribunal found a breach of responsibility by the disciplinary authority for not ensuring compliance with the Regulations. The failure to address the representation of contravention of natural justice principles and statutory prescriptions rendered the final decision unacceptable and inconsistent with the law. Consequently, the impugned order and proceedings following the show-cause notice were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh enquiry proceedings.

Remand of the Matter for Fresh Enquiry Proceedings:
The Tribunal directed the appellant to cooperate in the fresh enquiry proceedings, emphasizing adherence to timelines. The decision aimed to rectify the procedural irregularities and ensure compliance with the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation, 2018.

This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the issues raised, arguments presented, and the Tribunal's decision to address the procedural shortcomings and remand the matter for further proceedings.

---