ITAT decision: Late TDS payment upheld, deductions allowed for interest, loss by theft claim accepted

The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 83,768/- for late TDS payment but permitting deductions for interest on late payments of Sales Tax, Excise & Service Tax, and EPF. The ITAT also allowed the claim of Rs. 11,45,410/- for loss by theft, directing the AO to delete the corresponding addition.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of Rs. 3,94,946/- for delayed payment of ESI and PF under Section 2(24)(x) read with Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Addition of Rs. 11,45,410/- on account of claim of loss by theft.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition of Rs. 3,94,946/- for Delayed Payment of ESI and PF:

The assessee challenged the confirmation of the addition of Rs. 3,94,946/- by the CIT(A) under Section 2(24)(x) read with Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of delay in payment of ESI and PF. The assessee argued that the interest payments were compensatory and not penal in nature. The assessee cited several judgments, including CIT v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd (315 ITR 102), which held that interest on late deposit of TDS is compensatory and not penal.

The AO disallowed the interest payments, categorizing them as expenses for the violation of law. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, distinguishing between interest payments for business transactions and those for delayed statutory liabilities. The ITAT reviewed the case and noted that the issue of interest on late payment of TDS had already been decided against the assessee in a previous year by the Coordinate Bench. However, the ITAT allowed the interest payments on late payments of Sales Tax, Excise & Service Tax, and EPF, citing the compensatory nature of these payments as per the decision in CIT vs Western India State Motors (1988) 174 ITR 116 (Raj) and Lachmandas Mathura vs CIT (254 ITR 799).

2. Addition of Rs. 11,45,410/- on Account of Claim of Loss by Theft:

The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 11,45,410/- due to a theft that occurred in FY 2013-14, but the claim was made in AY 2016-17. The AO disallowed the claim, stating it should have been made in AY 2014-15 when the theft occurred. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, emphasizing that the loss should be accounted for in the year of occurrence as per the mercantile system of accounting.

The ITAT considered the facts and noted that the assessee was hopeful of recovery until the year under consideration, making the claim valid for AY 2016-17. The ITAT relied on CIT vs Durga Jewellers (172 ITR 0134), which allows the deduction of embezzlement losses when recovery becomes impossible or remote. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's claim for the loss by theft.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed. The ITAT upheld the addition of Rs. 83,768/- for the late payment of TDS but allowed the deduction for interest paid on late payments of Sales Tax, Excise & Service Tax, and EPF. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the claim of Rs. 11,45,410/- for the loss by theft, directing the AO to delete the corresponding addition.

---