Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to claim the benefit of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the assessment year under appeal, where the payee had filed its return of income only in the subsequent assessment year.
Analysis: The payment of finance charges was made without deduction of tax at source and the assessee sought relief under the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia). That proviso deems tax to have been deducted and paid on the date the resident payee furnishes its return of income, provided the assessee is not treated as an assessee in default under section 201. On the facts found, the recipient filed its return of income on 28.11.2013, which fell in the financial year relevant to assessment year 2014-15. The statutory benefit therefore accrued only from that subsequent assessment year and not for assessment year 2013-14. The later amendment relied upon by the assessee related to a different provision and did not alter this result.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the deduction in assessment year 2013-14 and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: The deeming relief under the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) becomes available only from the assessment year corresponding to the date on which the resident payee furnishes its return of income.