TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the contempt application could be proceeded with in the presence of a subsequent order giving rise to a fresh cause of action.
Analysis: The record was examined and the later order was treated as creating a fresh cause of action. On that basis, any allegation of non-compliance with that order was left to be pursued through the appropriate remedy available in law.
Conclusion: The contempt application was not entertained on its merits and was disposed of, with liberty to the applicants to pursue the appropriate legal remedy.
Final Conclusion: The proceeding ended at the contempt stage without adjudication of the underlying dispute, and the applicants were left to work out their remedies in accordance with law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
