<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 344 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388095</link>
    <description>A subsequent order was treated as giving rise to a fresh cause of action, so the contempt application could not be pursued on the same footing. Any allegation of non-compliance with that later order was left to be raised through the appropriate remedy available in law. The contempt proceeding was therefore not entertained on its merits and was disposed of, with liberty to the applicants to pursue the proper legal course.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 344 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388095</link>
      <description>A subsequent order was treated as giving rise to a fresh cause of action, so the contempt application could not be pursued on the same footing. Any allegation of non-compliance with that later order was left to be raised through the appropriate remedy available in law. The contempt proceeding was therefore not entertained on its merits and was disposed of, with liberty to the applicants to pursue the proper legal course.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>