ITAT Delhi Upholds CIT(A)'s Decisions on Reassessment and Validity of Payment

The ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. It emphasized the necessity of passing a speaking order on objections raised by the assessee during reassessment proceedings. Additionally, the payment made to the sponsor society was deemed a valid application of income by the charitable society, as per an MoU for creating infrastructure facilities, supported by the society's registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act.

---

---

Issues:
1. Failure to address objections of the assessee by passing a speaking order in a reassessment proceeding.
2. Disallowance of a payment made to the sponsor society as an application of income.

Issue 1: Failure to address objections of the assessee by passing a speaking order in a reassessment proceeding:
The appeal by the revenue was against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] pertaining to Assessment Year 2008-09. The grievance of the revenue was related to the failure of the Assessing Officer to address the objections of the assessee by passing a speaking order during the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 148. The CIT(A) observed that the absence of a speaking order by the Assessing Officer vitiated the proceedings and rendered the subsequent assessment order as bad in law. The DR supported the findings of the Assessing Officer, citing a decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras. However, the ITAT Delhi held that the failure to pass a speaking order on the objections of the assessee was in violation of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts India Limited. The ITAT Delhi dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) based on the legal precedents.

Issue 2: Disallowance of a payment made to the sponsor society as an application of income:
The second issue involved the disallowance of a payment of &8377; 718.49 Lakhs made to the sponsor society by the assessee. The Assessing Officer disallowed this amount, stating that it could not be considered as an application of income since the cost of infrastructure was not reflected in the balance sheet of the assessee. However, the CIT(A) overturned this disallowance, noting that the payment was made in accordance with an MoU between the sponsor society and the university for creating infrastructure facilities. The CIT(A) also highlighted that the sponsor society was registered under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, making such contributions a legitimate application of income by a charitable society. The ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the CIT(A), emphasizing that the payment was for creating infrastructure for the university and was a valid application of income by the assessee society.

In conclusion, the ITAT Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue, affirming the decisions of the CIT(A) on both issues. The judgment highlighted the importance of passing a speaking order on objections raised by the assessee during reassessment proceedings and upheld the validity of the payment made to the sponsor society as an application of income by the charitable society.

---