Tribunal Stays Tax Payment Demand, Sets Hearing Date The Tribunal granted a stay on the balance demand payment under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act until 28.02.2019 or the appeal's disposal, noting the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal Stays Tax Payment Demand, Sets Hearing Date
The Tribunal granted a stay on the balance demand payment under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act until 28.02.2019 or the appeal's disposal, noting the assessee had paid over 35% of the total tax demand. The next hearing was set for 12.02.2019, with a warning against unjustified adjournments. The stay application was disposed of with specified conditions, and the order was issued on 21/01/2019.
Issues involved: Stay application against penalty proceedings under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act for contravention of Section 269SS - Balance demand payment and installment schedule.
Analysis: 1. The assessee filed a stay application against the penalty order passed by the JCIT under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, raising a demand of Rs. 10 lacs for contravention of Section 269SS of the Act.
2. The assessee's representative argued that penalty proceedings were initiated based on information seized in another case, where no loan transactions were found in the assessee's accounts. The representative highlighted that the assessee denied taking any loan from a specific individual. Moreover, a partial payment of Rs. 3,50,000 had already been made towards the total demand.
3. The Departmental Representative opposed the stay petition, suggesting the assessee pay the remaining demand in installments within a specified timeframe.
4. After hearing both parties, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had paid over 35% of the total tax demand. Consequently, the Tribunal stayed the balance demand until 28.02.2019 or the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier.
5. The next hearing was scheduled for 12.02.2019, with the assessee's representative undertaking not to seek adjournments without reasonable cause, failing which the stay granted would be vacated.
6. Ultimately, the stay application was disposed of based on the directions provided, with the order pronounced in open court on 21/01/2019.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.