Services under ICT @ School Project not exempt under Entry 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax

The court concluded that the services provided by IL&FS Education and Technology Services Ltd. under the ICT @ School Project did not qualify for the exemption under Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The project involved a composite supply of goods and services, not solely services under a training programme. Therefore, the applicant's supply did not meet all the conditions required for the exemption, and the question was answered in the negative.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 to the services provided by the Applicant under the ICT @ School Project.

Detailed Analysis:

A. Services Provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory Administration:
The applicant, IL&FS Education and Technology Services Ltd., entered into a contract with the Director of Education (Secondary and Higher Secondary), Maharashtra State (DE(S&HS)) to implement the ICT project in 5000 government secondary and higher secondary schools. The applicant's activities included the supply and installation of computer hardware, software, and related infrastructure, as well as providing computer training to students and teachers. The contract involved both the provision of goods and services, with the applicant maintaining ownership of the infrastructure during the contract period of five years, after which the ownership would transfer to DE(S&HS) for a nominal value of Re. 1.

The judgment noted that the contract required the supply of both goods and services, not just services. This distinction is crucial because Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 pertains specifically to services provided to government entities. Since the contract involved a composite supply of goods and services, it did not meet the criteria for the exemption under this entry.

B. Services Provided Under Any Training Programme:
The applicant argued that the primary objective of the ICT project was to provide computer training, and the infrastructure was merely a means to facilitate this training. However, the judgment highlighted that the contract included significant components beyond training, such as the procurement and installation of hardware and software, site preparation, and maintenance. These activities were not naturally bundled with the training services and had distinct values attributable to them.

The judgment concluded that the ICT project could not be classified solely as a training programme. Instead, it was a composite supply of goods and services, with training being just one component. Therefore, the project did not meet the criteria for being considered a training programme under Entry No. 72.

C. Total Expenditure Borne by the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory Administration:
The applicant demonstrated that the total expenditure for the ICT project was borne by the Central and State Governments. This condition was fulfilled, as the funding came from government sources. However, since the other two conditions were not satisfied, this alone did not qualify the services for exemption under Entry No. 72.

Conclusion:
The judgment concluded that the services provided by the applicant under the ICT @ School Project did not qualify for the exemption under Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The project involved a composite supply of goods and services, not solely services under a training programme. Therefore, the applicant's supply did not meet all the conditions required for the exemption, and the question was answered in the negative.

---