Appellate Authority grants exemption under Entry 72 for bundled supply

The Appellate Authority modified the ruling of the Advance Ruling Authority and held that the supplies of goods and services by the Appellant qualify for exemption under Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate). The Authority determined that the supplies constitute a naturally bundled composite supply with computer training services as the principal supply, fulfilling the conditions for exemption from GST.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) to the services provided by the Appellant under the ICT project.
2. Determination of whether the supplies made by the Appellant constitute a composite supply or a mixed supply.
3. Identification of the principal supply in the composite supply, if applicable.
4. Fulfillment of conditions stipulated in Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate).

Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate):
The Appellant argued that the activities undertaken under the ICT project fall within the scope of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) as the services are provided under a training program to the Government of Maharashtra, with the entire expenditure borne by the Central and State Governments. The Appellant contended that the services provided, including computer training, should be exempt from GST as per the said notification.

2. Determination of Composite Supply vs. Mixed Supply:
The AAR ruled that the supplies made by the Appellant are artificially bundled, composite supplies of goods and services, and not naturally bundled. The Appellant contended that the supplies are naturally bundled composite supplies, with the principal supply being computer training services. The Appellate Authority agreed with the Appellant, stating that the supply involves both goods and training services and fulfills the requirements of Section 2(30) of the CGST Act for composite supply.

3. Identification of Principal Supply:
The Appellant argued that the principal supply is computer training services, supported by the fact that the aim of the agreement is to improve the quality of education in schools, and the infrastructure and equipment provided are ancillary to this aim. The Appellate Authority concurred, noting that the primary objective of the ICT project is to promote computer literacy and that the provision of hardware and software is incidental to the main service of computer training.

4. Fulfillment of Conditions in Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate):
The Appellate Authority examined the conditions for exemption under Entry No. 72, which requires that the services be provided under a training program to the Central or State Government and that the entire expenditure is borne by the government. The Authority found that these conditions were met as the services were provided to the Government of Maharashtra, and the expenditure was jointly borne by the Central and State Governments.

Conclusion:
The Appellate Authority modified the ruling of the Advance Ruling Authority and held that the supplies of goods and services by the Appellant to the Director of Education (S&HS) qualify for exemption under Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate). The Authority determined that the supplies constitute a naturally bundled composite supply with computer training services as the principal supply, thereby fulfilling the conditions for exemption from GST.

---