Availability of statutory appeal bars writ challenge to recovery communication, with time spent in writ proceedings excluded for appeal filing.

A writ petition challenging a recovery communication was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court held that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy instead of invoking writ jurisdiction at that stage, and granted exclusion of the bona fide time spent prosecuting the writ petition for the purpose of filing the appeal.

---

---

Outcome: The writ petition challenging the recovery communication was not entertained in view of the availability of an efficacious statutory appeal, and the petitioner was granted the benefit of exclusion of bona fide time spent in prosecuting the writ petition for filing the appeal.

---