https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366598 A writ petition challenging a recovery communication was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court held that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy instead of invoking writ jurisdiction at that stage, and granted exclusion of the bona fide time spent prosecuting the writ petition for the purpose of filing the appeal. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366598 A writ petition challenging a recovery communication was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court held that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy instead of invoking writ jurisdiction at that stage, and granted exclusion of the bona fide time spent prosecuting the writ petition for the purpose of filing the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366598