Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to Small Scale Industry exemption for clearances of goods cleared under the brand name of others, and whether the demand was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The clearances in question were admittedly made on behalf of third parties with the brand name of others affixed. On that admitted factual position, the benefit of the SSI exemption was not available to such branded goods. The plea of limitation also failed, as no acceptable case was made out to disturb the demand on that ground.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available and the demand was not barred by limitation; both contentions were rejected against the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order confirming duty and related consequences was upheld and the appeal was rejected.