<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1501 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366029</link>
    <description>SSI exemption was denied for clearances of goods manufactured on behalf of third parties and sold under another&#039;s brand name, because the admitted facts placed the goods outside the exemption scheme. The limitation plea also failed, as no acceptable basis was shown to displace the demand on that ground. The duty demand and related consequences were therefore sustained, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1501 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366029</link>
      <description>SSI exemption was denied for clearances of goods manufactured on behalf of third parties and sold under another&#039;s brand name, because the admitted facts placed the goods outside the exemption scheme. The limitation plea also failed, as no acceptable basis was shown to displace the demand on that ground. The duty demand and related consequences were therefore sustained, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>