Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exported rice satisfied the parameters under the DGFT notification and the amended notification, and whether confiscation of the exported goods was justified.
Analysis: The goods were exported as Indian Brown Basmati Rice Pusa-1121. The laboratory report showed that the sample met the prescribed grain length and length-breadth ratio requirements under Notification No. 55(RE-2008)/2004-2009 dated 05.11.2008 as amended by Notification No. 57/2009-2014 dated 17.08.2010. The Tribunal found that the parameters laid down in the notifications had been satisfied and that the directions issued earlier by the Tribunal had been complied with by the appellate authority.
Conclusion: The export could not be treated as prohibited on the facts found, and the order of confiscation was not sustainable. The Revenue's appeal failed.