<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 695 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353959</link>
    <description>Exported Indian Brown Basmati Rice Pusa-1121 was found to satisfy the grain length and length-breadth ratio requirements under the relevant DGFT notification and its amendment. On the laboratory report and the Tribunal&#039;s earlier directions having been complied with, the goods were treated as meeting the prescribed export parameters. As the export could not be regarded as prohibited on those facts, confiscation was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 695 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353959</link>
      <description>Exported Indian Brown Basmati Rice Pusa-1121 was found to satisfy the grain length and length-breadth ratio requirements under the relevant DGFT notification and its amendment. On the laboratory report and the Tribunal&#039;s earlier directions having been complied with, the goods were treated as meeting the prescribed export parameters. As the export could not be regarded as prohibited on those facts, confiscation was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>