https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353959 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the export of Indian Brown Basmati Rice Pusa-1121 despite not meeting Basmati Rice (Export) Grading and Marketing Rule, 1979 standards. The Commissioner (Appeals) determined the rice variety was permissible for export under specific notifications, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Despite discrepancies in test reports, the Tribunal found compliance with DGFT notifications, emphasizing satisfaction of parameters outlined in the notifications. The Tribunal affirmed that the Respondent was entitled to consequential relief as per the law, ultimately disposing of the Cross Objection. en-us Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353959 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the export of Indian Brown Basmati Rice Pusa-1121 despite not meeting Basmati Rice (Export) Grading and Marketing Rule, 1979 standards. The Commissioner (Appeals) determined the rice variety was permissible for export under specific notifications, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Despite discrepancies in test reports, the Tribunal found compliance with DGFT notifications, emphasizing satisfaction of parameters outlined in the notifications. The Tribunal affirmed that the Respondent was entitled to consequential relief as per the law, ultimately disposing of the Cross Objection. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353959