TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Unsigned appeal dismissed as not maintainable by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore. Filing errors have consequences.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BELGAUM Versus SB. ENGINEERS</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed the Revenue's appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 268/2006 due to it being unsigned by an authorized ... Filing an appeal – no signature – no verification – defective appeal – held that - the appeal has been filed by the Revenue without the signature of the authorized person on the ST-7 Form as well as on the Statement of Facts and Grounds of Appeal. We find that this appeal is not maintainable before us, as no person has signed the said appeal - . Filing of an appeal is a right to be exercised in a responsible manner, and we find that Revenue was callous in filing unsigned appeal, a situation which needs to be deprecated The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 268/2006 as it was not signed by an authorized person, making it not maintainable. The Tribunal found the act of filing an unsigned appeal to be irresponsible and callous. The appeal was deemed not curable and was therefore dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
