<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 168 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35149</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 268/2006 due to it being unsigned by an authorized person, rendering it not maintainable. The Tribunal considered the filing of an unsigned appeal as irresponsible and callous, deeming it not curable and thus dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 168 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35149</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 268/2006 due to it being unsigned by an authorized person, rendering it not maintainable. The Tribunal considered the filing of an unsigned appeal as irresponsible and callous, deeming it not curable and thus dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>