Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Education Cess and Higher Education Cess paid along with excise duty were refundable when the underlying excise duty itself stood exempted under the exemption notification.
Analysis: The exemption notification granted complete exemption from excise duty, with the refund mechanism operating only as the mode of giving effect to that exemption after adjustment of CENVAT credit. Education Cess and Higher Education Cess were levied as a surcharge on excise duty and were computed as a percentage of the aggregate of duties of excise. The Court relied upon the statutory scheme of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, the departmental circulars clarifying that no cess is payable where the parent duty is nil or fully exempt, and the principle that a surcharge cannot survive when the basic duty is not payable. It also held that the contrary view taken by the Tribunal could not prevail, and that where two views are possible the one favourable to the assessee must be adopted.
Conclusion: Education Cess and Higher Education Cess were held refundable along with excise duty once the excise duty itself stood exempted.
Ratio Decidendi: A cess levied as a surcharge on excise duty partakes the character of the underlying duty and cannot be retained when the basic excise duty is fully exempted.