Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess under Notification No. 39/01 dated 31/07/2001.
Analysis: The issue was treated as already settled by the Supreme Court in SRD Nutrients. In view of that binding decision, the contrary view taken in the impugned order could not stand.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the refund claim, and the impugned order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: When the Supreme Court has already settled the entitlement to refund on the same issue, a contrary order cannot be sustained and must be set aside.