Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of education cess and higher education cess for the period during which excise duty exemption was available under the applicable notification.
Analysis: The claim was considered in the light of the settled position that education cess and higher education cess, when levied as a percentage of excise duty, partake the character of excise duty. The parties also reached consensus that the departmental authorities were bound to extend the same refund benefit for the relevant period. The refund was directed to be worked out in accordance with the exemption notification applicable to the petitioner.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to refund of the education cess and higher education cess paid from January 2008 to December 2015.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was finally disposed of by directing the departmental authorities to compute and refund the cess amounts within the stipulated period.