Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of unutilised Cenvat credit relating to Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess after the exemption notification made the credit incapable of utilisation.
Analysis: The refund claim arose after the exemption notification, which left no further occasion to utilise the accumulated credit against duty liability. The Tribunal relied on the principle that where excise duty is no longer payable because of exemption, the related cess component, being part of the duty structure, cannot continue to remain blocked in credit. It also followed the reasoning that Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not bar refund in such a situation and that refund is permissible where credit becomes incapable of utilisation due to the changed duty position.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to refund of the unutilised credit of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess, and the appeal was allowed.