Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of education cess and higher education cess paid during the period May 2008 to February 2015 on the footing that such cess formed part of excise duty and became refundable once the underlying excise duty was exempted.
Analysis: The governing legal position had already been settled by the Supreme Court, which held that education cess and higher education cess levied at 2% of excise duty partake the character of excise duty itself and are refundable when excise duty is exempted. The respondents accepted that the same principle governed the present claim, and the Court proceeded on the basis of that consensus. The petitioner's claim was also linked to the exemption available under Notification No. 20/2007-CE dated 25.04.2007.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to refund of the education cess and higher education cess paid for the relevant period, and the respondents were directed to calculate and refund the amount within the stipulated time.