Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit on outward transportation of goods to the customer's premises was admissible for the disputed period and, if the entitlement depended on factual aspects, whether the matter required remand for fresh examination.
Analysis: The definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and the concept of place of removal under Section 4(3)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 required examination in the light of the nature of sale and freight arrangement. In view of the post-Ultratech circular issued by the Board, the field authorities were to verify the individual facts of each case. The relevant factual questions included whether the sales were on FOR basis, whether freight formed part of the sale price, and whether duty had been discharged on a value inclusive of freight. As those factual matters were not finally examined at the appellate stage, a fresh adjudication was considered necessary.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh consideration and verification of the factual eligibility of cenvat credit, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand.
Final Conclusion: The impugned rejection did not attain finality on the merits of credit eligibility, and the dispute was sent back for de novo examination with all issues left open before the adjudicating authority.
Ratio Decidendi: Where entitlement to cenvat credit on outward freight turns on disputed facts concerning the sale structure and freight inclusion, the matter should be remanded for factual verification rather than finally decided without such examination.