1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court in 2017 (1) TMI 481 dismissed a Civil Appeal due to delay.</h1> Supreme Court in 2017 (1) TMI 481 dismissed a Civil Appeal due to delay. - 2016 (342) E.L.T. A117 (SC) Whether βTouch Screen Kiosksβ are eligible for exemption u/not. 6/02 as βcomputersβ - appeal against the decision in the case of HCL PERIPHERALS Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI [2008 (4) TMI 195 - CESTAT, CHENNAI] - Held that: - The Civil Appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay - decided against appellant. Legal Judgment Summary:- Court: Supreme Court- Citation: 2017 (1) TMI 481 - SC- Judges: Mr. Madan B. Lokur and Mr. N.V. Ramana- Decision: Civil Appeal dismissed due to delay.