Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the touch-screen kiosks manufactured and cleared by the assessee were computers falling within Heading 84.71 and eligible for the concession or exemption under Sl. No. 261 of Notification No. 6/2002-CE.
Analysis: The kiosks were found to contain a CPU, monitor, keyboard and mouse, with input, processing and output functions integrated in the machine. The Explanation to the notification defined "computer" to include a CPU cleared with monitor, mouse and keyboard as a set, while excluding only input or output devices cleared separately. The presence of add-on features such as coin validator, MICR, touch screen and printer did not alter the essential character of the machine as a customized computer. The common parlance approach was held to be inappropriate where the notification itself provided a specific definition, and the evidence relied on by the department was rejected.
Conclusion: The kiosks were held to be computers covered by the notification and therefore eligible for the concessional or nil rate of duty; the duty demand and penalty were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification defines "computer" in specific terms, the machine must be classified according to that definition and not by a general common parlance test, and add-on functional features do not by themselves take a CPU, input and output set outside the definition of computer.