Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant should be directed to make a pre-deposit and, upon such deposit, whether recovery of the balance demand and penalty should be stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The order records that the appellant fairly offered to deposit a specified amount under the pre-deposit provision. The Tribunal accepted that offer as sufficient and directed deposit within eight weeks. It further granted waiver of the balance amount and stayed recovery during pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance with the deposit direction.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within eight weeks, and the balance duty and penalty were waived with recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance.