<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 277 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33545</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit was required as a condition for appeal, and the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s offer to deposit a specified amount within eight weeks. On that basis, the balance duty and penalty were waived, and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance with the deposit direction. The operative effect was conditional relief from recovery while preserving the pre-deposit requirement as the threshold for continued appellate protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 277 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33545</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit was required as a condition for appeal, and the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s offer to deposit a specified amount within eight weeks. On that basis, the balance duty and penalty were waived, and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance with the deposit direction. The operative effect was conditional relief from recovery while preserving the pre-deposit requirement as the threshold for continued appellate protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>